Used Coffee Grounds and Mushroom Spores Can Be 3D Printed Into a Compostable Plastic Alternative, Researchers Say

In a new study, researchers have made a promising discovery: a compostable material that can serve as an alternative to plastic. The material is made from a combination of used coffee grounds and spores from Reishi mushrooms that are made into a paste, then 3D printed.

The idea started when Danli Luo, corresponding author of the study and doctoral student of human-centered design and engineering at University of Washington, noticed the amount of coffee grounds that accumulated from making espresso at home.

Luo, along with co-author Junchao Yang and senior author Nadya Peek, explored how coffee grounds could serve as an ideal growing base for the strong mycelial network that precedes mushroom growth. The team set out to explore a way to use up the spent coffee grounds and make them into a strong, lightweight material that would be a more sustainable alternative to plastic.

First, they turned the coffee grounds into a Mycofluid paste by combining them with the spores of Reishi mushrooms, brown rice flower, water and xanthan gum to act as a binder. This created a promising material that would work with a 3D printer. 

From there, Luo developed a bespoke printer head to print the paste into more intricate and complex designs that could mimic the versatility of plastic without a need for molds. The researchers made multiple objects using the design, including shipping packing materials that could be a substitute for plastic foam (or Styrofoam), a vase, a small statue and a miniature coffin.

“We’re especially interested in creating systems for people like small businesses owners producing small-batch products — for example, small, delicate glassware that needs resilient packaging to ship,” Luo said. “So we’ve been working on new material recipes that can replace things like Styrofoam with something more sustainable and that can be easily customized for small-scale production.”

After printing, the team kept the objects moist and in a sealed plastic tub for 10 days to allow the mushroom spores to develop into a mycelial skin. Then, they removed the objects and dried them to prevent mushroom development. The team published their method in the journal 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing.

From the upper left to bottom right: the 3D printer creates a design; three printed pieces of a vase; the partially set vase pieces are put together; the mycelium grows on the coffee paste; the vase grows together; the finished vase holds flowers and water. Luo et al./3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing

According to the authors, their method costs $1,700 for hardware for the experiment, and the 3D printer could hold up one liter of paste at a time. By comparison, they noted that other similar solutions cost more than $7,000. However, they did note that the Mycofluid paste was dependent on uniform coffee grounds, which would limit scaling ability.

Moving forward, the researchers behind the coffee-and-mushroom material also hope to explore other food waste materials that could be developed into paste for 3D printing that may have better scaling opportunity.

“We’re interested in expanding this to other bio-derived materials, such as other forms of food waste,” Luo said. “We want to broadly support this kind of flexible development, not just to provide one solution to this major problem of plastic waste.”

More and more scientists are looking into ways to make use of the estimated 60 million tons of spent coffee grounds that are wasted globally each year. For instance, New Atlas reported that RMIT University researchers found a way to incorporate spent coffee grounds into concrete to make the concrete up to 30% stronger

Other coffee waste, such as the husks, have also been valuable to a Colombian company called Woodpecker, which has used coffee husks combined with recycled plastic to build low-cost, prefabricated buildings.

The post Used Coffee Grounds and Mushroom Spores Can Be 3D Printed Into a Compostable Plastic Alternative, Researchers Say appeared first on EcoWatch.

Gap Between Water Supply and Demand to Widen as Climate Warms: Study

Stronger water management efforts will be essential to overcoming the gap between supply and demand as the planet continues to warm, according to a new analysis by Lorenzo Rosa, principal investigator at Carnegie Science, and Matteo Sangiorgio, a researcher at the Polytechnic University of Milan.

For the study, the pair of researchers quantified issues of water scarcity under 1.5 and three degrees Celsius of global heating above pre-industrial levels, a press release from the Carnegie Institution of Science said.

“Water scarcity is one of the greatest challenges facing humanity this century,” Rosa said in the press release. “About 4 billion people reside and about half the world’s irrigated agriculture is in regions that experience water scarcity for at least one month each year.”

Life on Earth cannot exist without water. It is necessary for human health, food and energy security, environmental resilience, economic development and a wide range of human activities. Even though it is so important, in many places on our planet, demand for water exceeds available supply.

When water consumption is greater than the natural availability of water at any time during a month, it is referred to as a “water gap.” As time goes on, this kind of unsustainable use leads to depleted rivers, lakes, aquifers, groundwater and other natural water reserves.

“Water gaps are already an issue for communities around the world, resulting in either inadequate supplies of water or environmental degradation,” Rosa explained. “And as climate change further disrupts precipitation patterns and alters the water cycle, it will add even more stress.”

A sailing boat lays stranded on the dried-up bottom of Liptovska Mara freshwater reservoir that is at 40% of its normal capacity due to winter droughts, near Liptovsky Mikulas in Slovakia on Feb. 18, 2025. Robert Nemeti / Anadolu via Getty Images

Earlier research approached the subject by quantifying groundwater depletion or other reductions in water availability globally, while other studies looked at unsustainable use of water at the regional level.

This study combined the two strategies in order to fully comprehend the scope of the problem and make well-informed water management policies and plans going forward.

“We must be able to balance environmental resilience and the growing need for water in a warming world with a burgeoning population,” Rosa emphasized. “As cities grow, pollution, industrial water use, and irrigation will all increase, which will, in turn, exacerbate the water gap.”

Sangiorgio and Rosa quantified water gaps for scenarios under baseline, 1.5 and 3 degrees Celsius of warming, accounting for factors such as surface and groundwater depletion and water requirements for aquatic ecosystems.

The findings showed that there are already almost 458 billion cubic meters in water gaps annually. They are predicted to grow by 6% under a 1.5 degrees Celsius warming scenario and by 15% if the planet warms by 3 degrees Celsius.

“Even relatively modest increases in the water gap can put pressure on ecosystems and lead to severe shortages for agricultural use, resulting in food insecurity,” Rosa said.

Options to consider for water resources managers and lawmakers in order to increase water supplies include enhancing water storage capabilities by investing in resilient infrastructure, reusing treated wastewater, desalinating saltwater and bringing in water from other areas.

Farmers can prepare for the potential of water scarcity by planting crops that are less water intensive while investing in irrigation technologies that are more efficient.

“While water scarcity can affect entire regions, the most severe consequences are borne by the most vulnerable and impoverished populations, underscoring the important influence of economic and institutional factors in determining water scarcity,” the authors wrote in the study. “Under global warming, this fragile balance between supply and demand is likely to worsen, leading to a future where water resources struggle to meet growing societal and environmental needs. Consequently, many areas face a widening water gap, which threatens not only economic development and societies but also the health of aquatic ecosystems.”

The study, “Global water gaps under future warming levels,” was published in the journal Nature Communications.

The post Gap Between Water Supply and Demand to Widen as Climate Warms: Study appeared first on EcoWatch.

UK Agency Developing Early Warning System for Major Climate Tipping Points

The United Kingdom’s Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) plans to invest 81 million pounds in the development of an ambitious early warning system designed to detect climate tipping points.

The new system will use drones, plankton bloom patterns and cosmic ray detection combined with artificial intelligence and detailed, cutting-edge computer models, reported The Guardian.

“Major parts of the Earth system are at risk of crossing climate tipping points within the next century, with severe consequences for biodiversity, food security, agriculture, and humanity. Despite the potential impact, we’re poorly equipped to characterise the long-term trends of our climate systems, or predict the future risk of runaway, self-perpetuating change,” ARIA said in a press release. “Combining expertise in observation and modelling with innovative sensing systems, we’ll look to develop a proof-of-concept for an early warning system for climate tipping points that is affordable, sustainable and justified.”

Early warning system for climate tipping points given £81m kickstart: Ambitious UK project aims to forecast climate catastrophes using fleets of drones, cosmic ray detection, patterns of plankton blooms and more An ambitious attempt to develop an early warning system for climate tipping p…

[image or embed]

— The Guardian Climate News (unofficial) (@guardian-climate.bsky.social) February 18, 2025 at 9:07 AM

ARIA has awarded roughly $102 million to 27 project teams with a goal of finding signals that warn of the biggest climate disasters that could be triggered by the climate crisis.

ARIA’s early warning system program will be focused on two major tipping points: the collapse of the subpolar gyre (SPG) ocean current — a part of the crucial Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) — and the melting of Greenland’s ice sheet.

The collapse of ocean currents like AMOC would lead to global weather pattern changes, triggering extreme weather and wreaking havoc on the world’s food supplies, while the collapse of Greenland’s ice sheet would cause significant and potentially damaging sea level rise.

“In a similar way to how we use monitoring stations to detect and warn for tsunamis, we’re aiming to establish networks of climate monitoring systems to detect early signs of critical shifts in our climate,” said Sarah Bohndiek and Gemma Bale, who co-lead the ARIA program, as The Guardian reported. “Through these systems, we can equip decision-makers with the data they need to confront the threat of abrupt climate change head on.”

Sarah Bohndiek, 1 of 2 scientists leading the #ClimateChange program at ARIA, warned the world was less prepared for climate #TippingPoints than it was for #COVID19. “What would happen if we cross one of the climate tipping points?"

[image or embed]

— Carbon Tracker Initiative (@carbontracker.bsky.social) January 2, 2025 at 5:30 AM

At least 16 tipping points have been identified by scientists, some of which may have already been passed, from the thawing of permafrost in the north to a shift in west Africa’s monsoon.

ARIA hopes to come up with an early warning system capable of forecasting tipping points a decade ahead of time, where possible.

Professor Tim Lenton, an ARIA team leader and director of the Global Systems Institute at University of Exeter, said a warning like ARIA is proposing would incentivize the world to speed up climate action, since even if it wasn’t possible to stop a particular tipping point, having advance notice would give society time to prepare.

One of the program’s teams is developing small, high-speed drones to be used to gather better data in Greenland.

“Greenland is the fastest melting place on Earth, but this ice loss has knock-on effects for both North Atlantic ocean currents and fisheries. This crucial research will help us to understand how much freshwater the ice sheet is releasing, and what the subsequent effects will be on the ocean currents that bring warm waters and weather to the UK,” said Kelly Hogan of the British Antarctic Survey in the press release.

Another ARIA team is working on making devices that can move vertically through the ocean to collect data on the SPG.

“The UK and northern Europe could experience much harsher winters, similar to parts of Canada [if the SPG collapses], while the east coast of the U.S. could see dramatic sea level rises,” said Dr. Bieito Fernández Castro, a lecturer at University of Southampton who leads the SPG project, as reported by The Guardian.

One of the projects will develop detailed computer simulations of real-world data to evaluate the reliability of prospective early warning signals.

“We will make use of real-world examples of past tipping points to better understand these events,” said David Thornalley, a professor of ocean and climate science at University College London.

Another team will develop models to pinpoint where and when climate tipping points might happen.

“Forecasting tipping points is a formidable challenge,” said Dr. Reinhard Schiemann, associate professor of climate science at University of Reading. “But the fantastic range of teams tackling this challenge from different angles, yet working together in a coordinated fashion, makes this programme a unique opportunity.”

The post UK Agency Developing Early Warning System for Major Climate Tipping Points appeared first on EcoWatch.

Peatland and Mangrove Preservation Could Reduce Land-Use Emissions in Southeast Asia by Half, Study Says

Scientists have found that preservation and restoration for peat swamp forests and mangroves could help lower land-use emissions in Southeast Asia by about 54%. Because the region contributes to about one-third of global land-use carbon emissions, the reduction could also have a big impact globally, with a potential 16% reduction in land-use emissions worldwide.

Peatlands and mangroves account for around 5.4% of land area in Southeast Asia, but they have huge carbon sequestration properties, according to the scientists, who published their findings in the journal Nature Communications. As National University of Singapore (NUS) reported, peatlands and mangroves can sequester around 90% of carbon in the soil. The natural peatland and mangrove ecosystems also promote biodiversity.

Further, the scientists noted that Southeast Asia is home to a significant portion of the world’s tropical peatlands and mangroves, with Brunei, Cambodia, Timor Leste, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam accounting for 33% of global mangroves and 39% of global tropical peatlands.

Half of land use carbon emissions in Southeast Asia can be mitigated through peat swamp forest and mangrove conservation and restoration www.nature.com/articles/s41…

[image or embed]

— Ian Hall (@ianhall.bsky.social) February 11, 2025 at 6:40 AM

But with land-use changes, these ecosystems are under threat and risk emitting carbon rather than storing it. According to the Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide, some of the biggest threats to mangroves include coastal development and pollution. As the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) reported, peatland threats include drainage, burning, agriculture and mining.

“If we conserved and restored the carbon-dense peatlands and mangroves in Southeast Asia, we could mitigate approximately 770 megatonnes of CO2 equivalent (MtCO2e) annually, or nearly double Malaysia’s national greenhouse gas emissions in 2023,” Massimo Lupascu, senior author of the study and associate professor of geography at NUS, said in a statement.

As Mongabay News reported, restoring the peatlands and mangroves that are currently degraded — which includes around 5.34 million hectares (13.4 million acres) drained peatlands and 2.64 million hectares (6.52 million acres) otherwise degraded peatlands — could reduce emissions by around 94 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent per year alone.

Conservation of remaining peatlands should be a major focus. As NUS reported, it is difficult to recover sequestered carbon once the natural peatlands or mangroves have been disturbed by human activities. While restoration will still be important, conserving the remaining ecosystems is critical to reducing land-use emissions.

“These ecosystems pack a climate mitigation punch far beyond their size, offering one of the most scalable and impactful natural solutions to combat the planet’s climate crisis,” said Sigit Sasmito, first author of the study and a researcher at TropWATER at James Cook University.

In addition to prioritizing peatland and mangrove restoration and conservation, the study authors pointed out that these carbon-sequestering ecosystems could also provide economic value, such as through carbon credits, to outweigh the potential economic benefits of land-use changes.

“Wetland soils may have little agronomic value, as it is generally not well-suited for traditional farming or crop cultivation, but they are unmatched in their ability to store and preserve carbon,” Pierre Taillardat, co-author of the study and a principal investigator at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Singapore’s Wetland Carbon Lab, said in a statement. “If carbon were valued like other critical commodities, such as being traded on the carbon credits market, it could unlock vast opportunities for conservation and restoration projects. This will enable local communities to lead carbon management efforts with a win-win scenario where livelihoods and sustainable ecosystems thrive together.”

It will be important for countries to act quickly on peatland and mangrove preservation and restoration efforts. The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) recently reported that around 500,000 hectares of peatlands are destroyed each year, with East and Southeast Asia particularly affected. Degraded peatlands contribute to around 4% of all global anthropogenic carbon emissions.

The post Peatland and Mangrove Preservation Could Reduce Land-Use Emissions in Southeast Asia by Half, Study Says appeared first on EcoWatch.

Peatland and Mangrove Preservation Could Reduce Land-Use Emissions in Southeast Asia by Half, Study Says

Scientists have found that preservation and restoration for peat swamp forests and mangroves could help lower land-use emissions in Southeast Asia by about 54%. Because the region contributes to about one-third of global land-use carbon emissions, the reduction could also have a big impact globally, with a potential 16% reduction in land-use emissions worldwide.

Peatlands and mangroves account for around 5.4% of land area in Southeast Asia, but they have huge carbon sequestration properties, according to the scientists, who published their findings in the journal Nature Communications. As National University of Singapore (NUS) reported, peatlands and mangroves can sequester around 90% of carbon in the soil. The natural peatland and mangrove ecosystems also promote biodiversity.

Further, the scientists noted that Southeast Asia is home to a significant portion of the world’s tropical peatlands and mangroves, with Brunei, Cambodia, Timor Leste, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam accounting for 33% of global mangroves and 39% of global tropical peatlands.

Half of land use carbon emissions in Southeast Asia can be mitigated through peat swamp forest and mangrove conservation and restoration www.nature.com/articles/s41…

[image or embed]

— Ian Hall (@ianhall.bsky.social) February 11, 2025 at 6:40 AM

But with land-use changes, these ecosystems are under threat and risk emitting carbon rather than storing it. According to the Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide, some of the biggest threats to mangroves include coastal development and pollution. As the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) reported, peatland threats include drainage, burning, agriculture and mining.

“If we conserved and restored the carbon-dense peatlands and mangroves in Southeast Asia, we could mitigate approximately 770 megatonnes of CO2 equivalent (MtCO2e) annually, or nearly double Malaysia’s national greenhouse gas emissions in 2023,” Massimo Lupascu, senior author of the study and associate professor of geography at NUS, said in a statement.

As Mongabay News reported, restoring the peatlands and mangroves that are currently degraded — which includes around 5.34 million hectares (13.4 million acres) drained peatlands and 2.64 million hectares (6.52 million acres) otherwise degraded peatlands — could reduce emissions by around 94 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent per year alone.

Conservation of remaining peatlands should be a major focus. As NUS reported, it is difficult to recover sequestered carbon once the natural peatlands or mangroves have been disturbed by human activities. While restoration will still be important, conserving the remaining ecosystems is critical to reducing land-use emissions.

“These ecosystems pack a climate mitigation punch far beyond their size, offering one of the most scalable and impactful natural solutions to combat the planet’s climate crisis,” said Sigit Sasmito, first author of the study and a researcher at TropWATER at James Cook University.

In addition to prioritizing peatland and mangrove restoration and conservation, the study authors pointed out that these carbon-sequestering ecosystems could also provide economic value, such as through carbon credits, to outweigh the potential economic benefits of land-use changes.

“Wetland soils may have little agronomic value, as it is generally not well-suited for traditional farming or crop cultivation, but they are unmatched in their ability to store and preserve carbon,” Pierre Taillardat, co-author of the study and a principal investigator at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Singapore’s Wetland Carbon Lab, said in a statement. “If carbon were valued like other critical commodities, such as being traded on the carbon credits market, it could unlock vast opportunities for conservation and restoration projects. This will enable local communities to lead carbon management efforts with a win-win scenario where livelihoods and sustainable ecosystems thrive together.”

It will be important for countries to act quickly on peatland and mangrove preservation and restoration efforts. The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) recently reported that around 500,000 hectares of peatlands are destroyed each year, with East and Southeast Asia particularly affected. Degraded peatlands contribute to around 4% of all global anthropogenic carbon emissions.

The post Peatland and Mangrove Preservation Could Reduce Land-Use Emissions in Southeast Asia by Half, Study Says appeared first on EcoWatch.

World’s Richest Nations Are ‘Exporting Extinction’ With Demand for Agricultural and Forestry Imports: Study

The richest countries in the world are “exporting extinction” by destroying 15 times more biodiversity globally than they do within their own borders, according to a new Princeton University study.

The researchers found that 13.3 percent of biodiversity loss worldwide came from the consumption of high-income countries, a press release from Princeton said.

“Biodiversity loss has accelerated at an alarming rate in recent decades, driven largely by human activities such as clearing forests to grow crops or harvest timber. While countries often degrade ecosystems within their own borders through these activities, they also play a significant role in driving habitat loss overseas by outsourcing agricultural production, i.e., importing food or timber from other countries, thereby leading those other countries to destroy their forests to produce the exports,” the press release said.

The study is the first to quantify the degree of countries’ contributions to worldwide biodiversity loss when they shift the environmental impact of their consumption abroad.

The researchers looked at how 24 high-income countries impacted 7,593 forest-dependent animal species, from mammals and reptiles to birds. They integrated economic trade data with deforestation maps derived from satellites and information on species’ ranges from 2001 to 2015. By integrating the information, they were able to pinpoint severe biodiversity loss “hotspots” and quantify how much of each species’ habitat loss was attributable to the individual country’s imports.

“Tracing the impacts that countries have on the environment outside of their borders is difficult to do,” said lead author of the study Alex Wiebe, a doctoral student in Princeton’s Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, in the press release. “By combining satellite imagery with economic and biodiversity data, we are now able to measure and map exactly where countries impact species around the world for the first time.”

A scarlet-bellied mountain tanager. Alex Wiebe

The findings revealed that deforestation driven by the countries’ imports of crops and timber from beyond their borders caused over 13 percent of range loss for forest-dependent vertebrates worldwide, in addition to domestic biodiversity loss.

Each of these nations caused an average level of biodiversity loss that was 15 times higher than their own domestic impacts. The United States, France, Germany, China and Japan were among the top contributors. Eighteen of the two dozen countries had higher global than domestic effects on biodiversity loss.

“By importing food and timber, these developed nations are essentially exporting extinction,” said David Wilcove, the study’s co-author and a professor of ecology, evolutionary biology and public affairs at Princeton. “Global trade spreads out the environmental impacts of human consumption, in this case prompting the more developed nations to get their food from poorer, more biodiverse nations in the tropics, resulting in the loss of more species.”

The findings also showed that nations tend to have the biggest impact on species living in the nearest tropical regions.

U.S. consumption had the largest effect on Central American wildlife, while consumption by Japan and China strongly impacted Southeast Asia’s rainforest species.

The results also highlighted the harmful impacts international trade has on endangered species. The researchers discovered that over half of the ranges of a quarter of critically endangered species were lost due to international consumption over the course of the study period.

“By increasingly outsourcing their land use, countries have the ability to affect species around the world, even more than within their own borders,” Wiebe explained.  “This represents a major shift in how new threats to wildlife emerge.”

Wilcove highlighted the necessity of collaboration between exporting and importing countries in order to improve habitat conservation and boost the sustainability of trade practices.

”Global trade in food and timber is not going to stop,” Wilcove said. “What’s important is for the importing nations to recognize the environmental impacts this trade has on the exporting countries and to work with those countries to reduce those impacts. All nations stand to benefit by promoting habitat protection and sustainable agriculture because biodiversity benefits all nations.”

The study, “Global biodiversity loss from outsourced deforestation,” was published in the journal Nature.

The post World’s Richest Nations Are ‘Exporting Extinction’ With Demand for Agricultural and Forestry Imports: Study appeared first on EcoWatch.

Reintroducing Wolves to Scottish Highlands Could Boost Woodlands, Study Finds

The reintroduction of wolves to the Scottish Highlands could help expand native woodlands, which could in turn absorb and sequester one million additional tons of carbon dioxide annually, according to a new study.

The research, led by scientists at the University of Leeds, modeled wolves’ potential impact in four areas of Scottish Wild Land, where increasing populations of red deer feeding on tree saplings is suppressing the natural regeneration of woodland trees, a press release from the University of Leeds said.

“There is an increasing acknowledgement that the climate and biodiversity crises cannot be managed in isolation,” said Dominick Spracklen, a professor of biosphere-atmosphere interactions in the School of Earth and Environment at the University of Leeds, in the press release. “We need to look at the potential role of natural processes such as the reintroduction of species to recover our degraded ecosystems and these in turn can deliver co-benefits for climate and nature recovery.”

To estimate that the reintroduction effort to areas in the Southwest, Northwest and Central Highlands, as well as in the Cairngorms, would result in a total wolf population of approximately 167 wolves, the team used a predator-prey model. That number of wolves would be sufficient to reduce populations of red deer enough to allow trees to grow back naturally.

Reintroducing wolves to Scottish Highlands could help expand native woodlands, says study – Researchers say the animals could keep red deer numbers under control, leading to storage of 1m tonnes of CO2 www.theguardian.com/environment/…

[image or embed]

— Damian Carrington (@dpcarrington.bsky.social) February 17, 2025 at 4:19 AM

With wolves keeping the red deer population in check, native woodland could expand to take up 1.1 million tons of carbon dioxide per year, or roughly five percent of the United Kingdom’s carbon removal target for woodlands. The UK Climate Change Committee has said that is the amount needed to achieve net-zero by 2050.

The researchers estimate the presence of each wolf would result in an uptake of 6,702 tons of carbon each year, giving each of the predators a carbon valuation “worth” of roughly $194,554.

The findings of the study, “Wolf reintroduction to Scotland could support substantial native woodland expansion and associated carbon sequestration,” were published in the journal Ecological Solutions and Evidence.

The research is the first time wolf reintroduction’s potential impacts on woodland expansion and the resulting carbon storage have been assessed in the UK. According to the research team, the results are further evidence that large carnivores play an important role in providing essential nature-based solutions to address the climate crisis.

Scotland eradicated its wolves roughly 250 years ago, which left red deer without natural predators. Red deer numbers in the country have exploded in the past century, despite ongoing management, with the most recent estimates as high as 400,000.

A lack of natural regeneration of trees has led to the decline and loss of Scotland’s native woodlands. Today, the country’s levels are some of the lowest in Europe, with just four percent of it covered in native woodland.

Natural tree regeneration has been largely restricted to fenced areas where deer are excluded. More intensive deer management has been proven to help trees regenerate, with seedling numbers rising when deer numbers are lower than four per square kilometer.

Western Europe’s wolf population is now more than 12,000, with wolves occupying 67 percent of their historical range in Europe, including in Central Europe’s human-dominated landscapes.

The researchers said the financial benefits of carbon uptake and storage that would come from reintroducing wolves to the Scottish Highlands would be added to other proven ecological and economic impacts of wolf reintroduction, such as ecotourism, a reduced number of deer-vehicle accidents, fewer cases of deer-associated Lyme disease and fewer deer culls.

“Our aim is to provide new information to inform ongoing and future discussions about the possibility of wolf reintroductions both in the UK and elsewhere,” said farmer and author Lee Schofield, who co-authored the study. “We recognise that substantial and wide-ranging stakeholder and public engagement would be essential before any wolf reintroduction could be considered. Human-wildlife conflicts involving carnivores are common and must be addressed through public policies that account for people’s attitudes for reintroduction to be successful.”

The post Reintroducing Wolves to Scottish Highlands Could Boost Woodlands, Study Finds appeared first on EcoWatch.

Renewable Energy Is a Less Costly, More Efficient Climate Solution Than Carbon Capture, Study Finds

The benefits of investing in clean energy, including solar, wind, geothermal and hydropower, make renewables a more cost-effective option compared to carbon capture technology, according to a new study.

The study, published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology, examined two scenarios across 149 countries through 2050: one in which the countries transition 100% of their business-as-usual energies into renewables, or wind-water-solar (WWS) sources, and another scenario in which policies invest in carbon capture (CC) and synthetic direct air carbon capture (SDACC). 

In the second scenario, the energy mix would still include fossil fuels and renewables, the same as the current combination of energy sources. Both scenarios accounted for the same improvements in energy efficiency, Clean Technica reported. The study authors compared the energy costs, public health impacts and changes in emissions of each scenario.

#RenewableEnergy vs. #CarbonCapture "If you spend $1 on carbon capture instead of on wind, water, and solar, you are increasing CO2, air pollution, energy requirements, energy costs, pipelines, and total social costs" @mzjacobson techxplore.com/news/2025-02…

[image or embed]

— Silicon Valley North – Citizens Climate Lobby (@cclsvn.bsky.social) February 17, 2025 at 12:58 PM

In the carbon capture scenario, countries would accrue $60 trillion to $80 trillion per year in social costs, or the costs related to energy, health and climate that are created with each additional ton of carbon dioxide emissions. Even if all carbon was captured and stored, this scenario would see a rise in non-carbon dioxide emissions, increased air pollution, higher energy needs and higher infrastructure costs.

By comparison, the WWS scenario accounted for a decrease in energy demand by about 54.4%, a decrease in annual energy costs of around 59.6% and a decline in annual social costs of 91.8%, the study found.

“If you spend $1 on carbon capture instead of on wind, water, and solar, you are increasing CO2, air pollution, energy requirements, energy costs, pipelines, and total social costs,” lead study author Mark Jacobson, lead author of the study and a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University, said in a statement

New Study: Carbon Capture Is A Waste Of Money, & Counterproductive cleantechnica.com/2025/02/15/n… @cleantechnica.bsky.social

[image or embed]

— Mark Z. Jacobson (@mzjacobson.bsky.social) February 17, 2025 at 2:09 AM

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), which was not involved in the study, carbon capture is a technology that captures and stores carbon dioxide, typically from major polluting sites like power plants or industrial facilities. While carbon capture could help reduce emissions from heavily polluting sites, IEA noted that even with increasing deployment of carbon capture globally, the numbers remain far below what is necessary to reach net-zero emissions.

This new study takes the implementation of carbon capture to an extreme and finds even with nearly perfect carbon capture rates, the costs of investing in carbon capture over renewables would still be less beneficial than focusing on clean energy sources over fossil fuel dependence.

“It’s always an opportunity cost to use clean, renewable energy for direct air capture instead of replacing a fossil-fuel CO2 source, just like it’s an opportunity cost to use it for AI or bitcoin mining,” Jacobson said. “You’re preventing renewables from replacing fossil fuel sources because you’re creating more demand for those renewables.”

Further, investing in renewables rather than relying on fossil fuels coupled with carbon capture would lead to improved health outcomes, the study determined. As Stanford University reported, the WWS scenario would avoid 5 million deaths annually and hundreds of millions of other illnesses related to air pollution.

According to the authors, policies should stop promoting CC and SDACC and instead emphasize clean energy solutions.

“The only way to eliminate all air-pollutant and climate-warming gases and particles from energy is to eliminate combustion,” the authors wrote.

The post Renewable Energy Is a Less Costly, More Efficient Climate Solution Than Carbon Capture, Study Finds appeared first on EcoWatch.

‘Into the Thaw’: Jon Waterman on a Changing Alaska

With each new federal administration, energy priorities shift. With the election of Donald Trump in 2024, one of his administration’s key promises, enforced by an executive order on January 20 this year and as promised in Project 2025, was to try to ramp up oil and gas drilling in the continental U.S. A key location for increased extraction? Alaska, the remote northern state that always seems to be at the tip of the tongue when the expression “drill, baby, drill” is uttered. 

But despite the fervor from the administration, recent lease auctions for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge failed to find a buyer. Other locations off the shore of Alaska are more likely to see increasing oil production, and some, like the massive Pikka Project on the north slope of Alaska, are already underway

One person who knows Alaska as deeply as anyone can who doesn’t live there is writer and explorer Jon Waterman.

“I suppose I’ve taken 50 or 60 different trips and expeditions to Alaska,” he says. 

His new book, Into the Thaw: Witnessing Wonder Amid the Arctic Climate Crisis, reminds us, in beautifully rendered prose and photos, of the beauty of Alaska, and what’s at stake as the land, wildlife and peoples feel the pressures of climate breakdown and increased oil and gas production. 

Waterman writes: 

The sea ice has melted away as storms erode shorelines and flood villages. Forests are slowly on the move north along with animals new to the Arctic. The permafrost has begun to thaw, and lakes have disappeared as riverbanks and mountainsides droop like frozen spinach left out on the counter. 

The book tracks his most recent visit into Noatak River in Gates of the Arctic National Park, and what he saw that was so drastically different from his first visit 39 years ago. 

How would you describe the climate crisis in Alaska? 

The sea ice is what makes travel safe for the people in the summertime. Sea ice is what allows the polar bears to hunt their seals. And it controls the temperature of the Arctic.

The tree lines have begun to move north. The permafrost is thawing. It’s a whole cascade, like dominoes knocking one another over as the Arctic continues to warm. In fact, Alaska has warmed four times faster than the rest of the Earth.

And in your view, what’s different about this climate change compared with others from the long history of our planet, which you write about in the book?

The difference with the last 150 years is that it’s happened so quickly. And it’s the Anthropocene. Humans have caused this change, and that’s never happened before.

Can you tell me more about the melting permafrost? What are the impacts of that on the far north? 

As that permafrost thaws, the microbes begin to eat all this plant matter and that releases carbon dioxide gases. But it also releases methane, which is a much more potent greenhouse gas. And this could equal one of the largest triggers of greenhouse gases, because there’s so much methane and carbon stored in the ground that is abruptly thawing in many places.

On hillsides and mountainsides throughout the Arctic, it’s now very common to see what looks like landslides. These are recent thermalkarsts thawing. Downstream of these thermalkarsts, they’re just pumping tons of mud and silt into the river. And that affects the local villagers because they can’t fish. And then even more importantly, it affects all the aquatic life from the fish on down to the microbial life.

Permafrost melting into the Beaufort Sea. Photo by Jon Waterman

And what about the wildlife? 

The lengthening seasons and the lengthening summer have changed the migration patterns of many animals, birds and most notably, caribou. The caribou herds equal food security for many of the people in the far north.

Most of the herds are in a drastic decline. And this is broadly attributed to habitat loss and to climate change, because the warming of the Arctic causes another phenomenon called greening of the Arctic. The last time I went to the Arctic, I was amid the western Arctic caribou herd. And that herd used to be half a million strong. The latest census puts them at 152,000. 

Beavers have come to the Arctic. Beavers were never found in the Arctic prior to 1980. And in just this one portion of northwestern Alaska that I traveled through, through aerial photography, they counted over 11,000 new beaver dams in Arctic Alaska. Red foxes have begun to move north of tree line. There are more moose, and salmon are beginning to spawn in places they’d never spawn before as the waters have warmed.

A porcupine caribou herd seeks breezier high ground for insect relief in the southern Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Photo by Jon Waterman

You visited several Indigenous villages throughout Alaska and in other parts of the far north. What are some of your observations from them? 

The first time I was alerted to the changing north was in 1997. I was in a hunting camp in the Beaufort Sea in Canada, and an elder told me that they were starting to see robins and bluebirds, which they’ve never seen in their village before. And they’d just started to see salmon, and they were having mosquitoes come to their village. And I guess it was a breezy place, and it it stopped being breezy.

They used to have sled dog races on the 4th of July. They could no longer hold sled dog races in the summertime, because there was no longer any snow in the summer. It had gotten so warm. 

As a writer who has written books on the national parks, on Denali Mountain and others, what drew you to nature writing? 

I’ve always been an environmentalist at heart. I read the works of Rachel Carson and Edward Abbey and Peter Matheson and realized that nature is defenseless in that it doesn’t have a voice to speak for itself.

This issue of climate change is just the one grave environmental issue, perhaps the greatest of them all, right up there with overpopulation, that we need to be alert to and that we need to make the public aware of.

Your most recent trip was with your son. Looking to the future, what might people see a hundred years from now in Alaska? What are your hopes? 

Alaska has always been perceived as the last frontier, and I think that’s still true today. And I would hope it’s true a century from now. Thanks to Jimmy Carter and the Alaska National Interest Lands Claims Act that he signed in 1980, we have an enormous amount of protected wilderness and public lands in Alaska.

But that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t continue to speak up for it and defend it. But I think that I’m optimistic and hopeful about the future of Alaska, because of all its protected wildlands.

A flooded river that washed out campsites and gravel bars throughout the Noatak headwaters. Photo by Jon Waterman

The post ‘Into the Thaw’: Jon Waterman on a Changing Alaska appeared first on EcoWatch.

‘Wild Concerto’ by Former Police Drummer Stewart Copeland Blends Nature Sounds With Music

In a new collaboration between former Police drummer Stewart Copeland and British naturalist Martyn Stewart — titled Wild Concerto — the chirps of Arctic terns blend with other wildlife calls and orchestral music to create a multi-layered soundscape.

The unique composition by Copeland, a seven-time Grammy award-winner, drew on Stewart’s field recordings, reported The Guardian.

Copeland said none of the recordings of nature had been re-tuned or manipulated in any way.

“All the bird and animal sounds are exactly as they were, but I put them in positions so that they add up to a melody and rhythm,” Copeland said. “Instead of sopranos and tenors, I’m working with hyenas, wolves and a chorus of birds. Their voices bring an unparalleled authenticity to the music.”

The “collaboration between nature and music” — including a frog-saxophone duet and a piano nocturne accompanied by the hoot of an Asian barred owlet — will be performed on tour by Copeland, the nature recordings and the 30-musician Kingdom Orchestra.

‘The synergy is amazing’: Stewart Copeland album fuses nature and music

[image or embed]

— The Guardian (@theguardian.com) February 14, 2025 at 4:55 AM

“They all have their own individual, often atonal melodies but when you put a flute against a red-breasted nuthatch, for example, the synergy is amazing,” Copeland said. “I picked out sounds that I felt were the soloists, like the wolves, and others that were more atmospheric, like the wild winds of Antarctica, and treated them in a similar way to a trombone or a guitar… The wolves are howling with great soul, great passion, and accompanied by a trombone following their line. It’s jazz, the jazz wolf of the Arctic tundra.”

Wild Concerto was inspired by the Arctic to Antarctica migration of Arctic terns, as well as some of the animals and birds they potentially encounter on their journey.

Over the course of six decades, Stewart captured many of the natural sounds that have been featured in natural history shows like Blue Planet, as well as roughly 150 films, such as Frozen and Cold Mountain.

“Many of these species are endangered and their sounds could vanish in our lifetime. Through the Wild Concerto, their voices are immortalised,” Stewart said.

Stewart, who has been called “the David Attenborough of sound,” has an archive of nearly 100,000 recordings from more than 60 countries.

“I was so sceptical about sticking natural sounds with music. So many saunas and salons play new age music with pianos and oceans and I thought that’s what it was going to sound like. But I was just gobsmacked,” Stewart said.

Stewart hopes the pioneering composition will raise awareness of species that have gone extinct, are endangered or have been impacted by noise pollution to the extent that a clean recording cannot be made of their calls.

“Two-thirds of the species in my library are now basically extinct. Twenty-five or 30 years ago, when I wanted to record one pristine hour of sound, it took about three or four hours to do that with minimal editing,” Stewart said. “Today, if I want to record an hour’s pristine sound, it takes about 2,000 hours to get that because there are so many manmade sounds in the environment… There’s about 10 endangered species on the album… poison dart frogs, wolves, Galápagos tortoise.”

Stewart’s entire archive has been donated to nonprofit The Listening Planet. Co-founded with Amanda Hill, Stewart’s niece, the charity promotes conservation, celebrates biodiversity and “reminds the world why nature’s voice is worth listening to.”

The artwork for the Wild Concerto album cover was created by Diana Beltrán Herrera and consists of intricate layers of beautifully crafted paper figures.

Wild Concerto will be released by Platoon Records in April. On Earth Day — April 22 — Copeland and fellow composer Arash Safaian will meet at London’s Kings Place to discuss their composition and the more extensive relationship between nature and music, before Copeland embarks on a nationwide tour in October.

The post ‘Wild Concerto’ by Former Police Drummer Stewart Copeland Blends Nature Sounds With Music appeared first on EcoWatch.