Microplastics Are Widespread in Popular Types of Seafood, Study Shows

Microplastics shed from plastic products like clothing and packaging are ending up in the fish we eat, according to researchers from Portland State University (PSU).

The findings of the study highlight a need for strategies and technologies to reduce the microfiber pollution that makes its way into the environment, a press release from PSU said.

“Microplastics (MPs) and other anthropogenic particles (APs) are pervasive environmental contaminants found throughout marine and aquatic environments. We quantified APs in the edible tissue of black rockfish, lingcod, Chinook salmon, Pacific herring, Pacific lamprey, and pink shrimp, comparing AP burdens across trophic levels and between vessel-retrieved and retail-purchased individuals,” the researchers wrote in the study. “Anthropogenic particles were found in 180 of 182 individuals… These findings suggest a need for further research into technologies and strategies to reduce microfiber pollution entering the environment.”

Scientists from the Applied Coastal Ecology Lab at PSU built on earlier research that explored the pervasiveness of microplastics in bivalves such as Pacific razor clams and oysters, the press release said. Led by Elise Granek, an environmental science and management professor, the team focused on commonly eaten crustaceans and finfish.

Their goal was to fill in the gaps regarding microplastic contamination in shellfish and finfish in Oregon, while gaining a better understanding of differences across trophic levels — which arrange the position of fish in the food chain — as well as in pathways to consumers.

The researchers quantified particles from materials modified or produced by humans that they discovered in the edible tissues of half a dozen species that are culturally or economically important in Oregon: Chinook salmon, lingcod, black rockfish, Pacific lamprey, Pacific herring and pink shrimp.

The team then compared concentrations of particles across trophic levels, as well as whether where the microplastics were positioned in the food web had an effect on how much and what was contaminating the edible tissue of the fish. They also looked at whether samples obtained directly from research vessels differed from those of seafood vendors and supermarkets.

The researchers found 1,806 suspected plastic particles in 180 out of 182 individual samples. Fibers were most abundant, followed by films and fragments.

The study, “From the ocean to our kitchen table: anthropogenic particles in the edible tissue of U.S. West Coast seafood species,” was published in the journal Frontiers in Toxicology.

Of the species the research team sampled, pink shrimp were found to have the highest particle concentrations in their edible tissues. The lowest concentrations were found in Chinook salmon, followed by lingcod and black rockfish.

“We found that the smaller organisms that we sampled seem to be ingesting more anthropogenic, non-nutritious particles,” Granek said in the press release. “Shrimp and small fish, like herring, are eating smaller food items like zooplankton. Other studies have found high concentrations of plastics in the area in which zooplankton accumulate and these anthropogenic particles may resemble zooplankton and thus be taken up for animals that feed on zooplankton.”

The team expected processing would introduce more contaminants from plastic packaging, but that was not found to be universally true. The researchers also discovered that rinsing shrimp and fish fillets — as many people do before preparing them — could, in some cases, remove additional contamination that might have landed on the surface between catch and consumer.

Overall, the study provided evidence of widespread plastic particles and fibers in the edible tissues of marine and freshwater species in Oregon.

“It’s very concerning that microfibers appear to move from the gut into other tissues such as muscle,” Susanne Brander, an ecotoxicologist with Oregon State University who helped with lab analysis, said in the press release. “This has wide implications for other organisms, potentially including humans too.”

The researchers said the findings demonstrate the need for more studies to understand how particles end up in muscle tissue, along with policies to regulate anthropogenic particles.

“This project established critical baseline data for West Coast fisheries stakeholders and highlighted how much we still do not know about these pervasive microplastic pollutants,” said Summer Traylor, who led the project with help from Marilyn Duncan, an environmental science student who graduated from PSU in 2024. Traylor graduated with a master’s in environmental management in 2022 and is now a NOAA Corps Officer.

Rather than recommending people avoid seafood, the authors of the study are instead focusing on solutions.

“If we are disposing of and utilizing products that release microplastics, those microplastics make their way into the environment, and are taken up by things we eat,” Granek said. “What we put out into the environment ends up back on our plates.”

“We’re continuing to do work to understand the effects of anthropogenic particles on animals, but we’re also moving into experimental work to test what are effective solutions to reduce microplastics entering marine ecosystems,” Granek added.

The post Microplastics Are Widespread in Popular Types of Seafood, Study Shows appeared first on EcoWatch.

Thailand Bans Plastic Waste Imports in Effort to Curb Toxic Pollution

Following years of campaigning by environmental activists, Thailand has banned foreign imports of plastic waste due to concerns about toxic pollution.

Experts warn that the failure to reach an agreement on a global treaty to eliminate plastic waste will have adverse impacts on human health, reported The Guardian.

“The ban on imports will help stimulate plastic recycling in Thailand, ensuring more efficient resource usage and reducing the amount of unused plastic waste,” said Arada Fuangthong, director-general of Thailand’s Department of Foreign Trade, as Sustainable Plastics reported. “This will also help reduce pollution that could impact the environment and public health.”

Fuangthong added that Thailand’s plastic waste problem has increased “significantly,” and that the country has struggled with electronic waste being smuggled in mixed with plastic waste.

Issued by the Thai Department of Foreign Trade on January 1, the new regulation provided a grace period from December 17 to 31 to allow for the completion of pending imports.

The guidelines require the promotion of domestic plastic waste recycling by responsible agencies under the Bio, Circular, Green (BCG) economy model framework.

Thailand became a main destination for plastic waste exports from the United States, Japan, Europe and the United Kingdom after a ban was imposed by China — the largest household waste market in the world — in 2018, reported The Guardian.

Japan is among the biggest waste plastic exporters to Thailand, sending roughly 50 million kilograms of discarded plastics in 2023.

According to Thai customs officials, over 1.21 million tons of plastic scraps were received by the country from 2018 to 2021.

“The ban on all plastic scrap imports should be seen as a triumph for civil society in preventing hazardous waste from entering Thailand,” said Penchom Sae-Tang, director of NGO Ecological Alert and Recovery, as the Bangkok Post reported. “However, our work is far from over. Vigilant monitoring and robust cooperation with authorities will be critical to ensuring the law is enforced for the benefit of all.”

Plastic waste imports have been frequently burned by factories rather than being recycled, leading to negative impacts for the environment and human health, reported The Guardian.

“While this is a great step forward for Thailand, there is more work to be done. After the law comes into effect, the Thai government must work to ensure its enforcement and implementation. This means industrial, environmental and customs agencies must cooperate to prevent any illicit imports of plastic waste… the current law does not address the transit of plastic waste, meaning Thailand could be used as a transit state to send waste to our… neighbours. The Thai government must guard against this,” said Punyathorn Jeungsmarn, a plastics campaign researcher with the Environmental Justice Foundation, as The Guardian reported.

European exports of plastic waste to non-OECD nations have increased over the past several years, reported Sustainable Plastics.

Rules regulating the global export of plastic scrap exist, but compliance is hard to assess.

Thailand’s new ban comes as attempts to rescue the global plastics treaty continue. Countries failed last year to agree on a final draft following talks in Busan, South Korea.

A draft text was supported by more than 100 countries, but oil-producing nations like Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran resisted cuts to plastics production.

A date has not yet been set for further discussions on a global treaty to eliminate plastic waste.

“Plastic pollution is now recognised as not only an environmental crisis but also a critical human health crisis. The need for decisive international action to tackle plastic pollution has never been more urgent,” said professor Steve Fletcher, director of University of Portsmouth’s Revolution Plastics Institute, as The Guardian reported.

Fletcher pointed out that burning plastic as a waste management method posed severe health risks that were compounded by the plastic waste trade.

“With 16% of global municipal waste burned openly, rising to 40-65% in low-and middle-income countries, vulnerable populations bear the brunt of this crisis. The toxic fumes from burning plastic are a silent but deadly contributor to global health burdens. Urgent action is needed,” said Dr. Cressida Bowyer, deputy director of Revolution Plastics Institute, as reported by The Guardian.

The post Thailand Bans Plastic Waste Imports in Effort to Curb Toxic Pollution appeared first on EcoWatch.

Thailand Bans Plastic Waste Imports in Effort to Curb Toxic Pollution

Following years of campaigning by environmental activists, Thailand has banned foreign imports of plastic waste due to concerns about toxic pollution.

Experts warn that the failure to reach an agreement on a global treaty to eliminate plastic waste will have adverse impacts on human health, reported The Guardian.

“The ban on imports will help stimulate plastic recycling in Thailand, ensuring more efficient resource usage and reducing the amount of unused plastic waste,” said Arada Fuangthong, director-general of Thailand’s Department of Foreign Trade, as Sustainable Plastics reported. “This will also help reduce pollution that could impact the environment and public health.”

Fuangthong added that Thailand’s plastic waste problem has increased “significantly,” and that the country has struggled with electronic waste being smuggled in mixed with plastic waste.

Issued by the Thai Department of Foreign Trade on January 1, the new regulation provided a grace period from December 17 to 31 to allow for the completion of pending imports.

The guidelines require the promotion of domestic plastic waste recycling by responsible agencies under the Bio, Circular, Green (BCG) economy model framework.

Thailand became a main destination for plastic waste exports from the United States, Japan, Europe and the United Kingdom after a ban was imposed by China — the largest household waste market in the world — in 2018, reported The Guardian.

Japan is among the biggest waste plastic exporters to Thailand, sending roughly 50 million kilograms of discarded plastics in 2023.

According to Thai customs officials, over 1.21 million tons of plastic scraps were received by the country from 2018 to 2021.

“The ban on all plastic scrap imports should be seen as a triumph for civil society in preventing hazardous waste from entering Thailand,” said Penchom Sae-Tang, director of NGO Ecological Alert and Recovery, as the Bangkok Post reported. “However, our work is far from over. Vigilant monitoring and robust cooperation with authorities will be critical to ensuring the law is enforced for the benefit of all.”

Plastic waste imports have been frequently burned by factories rather than being recycled, leading to negative impacts for the environment and human health, reported The Guardian.

“While this is a great step forward for Thailand, there is more work to be done. After the law comes into effect, the Thai government must work to ensure its enforcement and implementation. This means industrial, environmental and customs agencies must cooperate to prevent any illicit imports of plastic waste… the current law does not address the transit of plastic waste, meaning Thailand could be used as a transit state to send waste to our… neighbours. The Thai government must guard against this,” said Punyathorn Jeungsmarn, a plastics campaign researcher with the Environmental Justice Foundation, as The Guardian reported.

European exports of plastic waste to non-OECD nations have increased over the past several years, reported Sustainable Plastics.

Rules regulating the global export of plastic scrap exist, but compliance is hard to assess.

Thailand’s new ban comes as attempts to rescue the global plastics treaty continue. Countries failed last year to agree on a final draft following talks in Busan, South Korea.

A draft text was supported by more than 100 countries, but oil-producing nations like Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran resisted cuts to plastics production.

A date has not yet been set for further discussions on a global treaty to eliminate plastic waste.

“Plastic pollution is now recognised as not only an environmental crisis but also a critical human health crisis. The need for decisive international action to tackle plastic pollution has never been more urgent,” said professor Steve Fletcher, director of University of Portsmouth’s Revolution Plastics Institute, as The Guardian reported.

Fletcher pointed out that burning plastic as a waste management method posed severe health risks that were compounded by the plastic waste trade.

“With 16% of global municipal waste burned openly, rising to 40-65% in low-and middle-income countries, vulnerable populations bear the brunt of this crisis. The toxic fumes from burning plastic are a silent but deadly contributor to global health burdens. Urgent action is needed,” said Dr. Cressida Bowyer, deputy director of Revolution Plastics Institute, as reported by The Guardian.

The post Thailand Bans Plastic Waste Imports in Effort to Curb Toxic Pollution appeared first on EcoWatch.

Thailand Bans Plastic Waste Imports in Effort to Curb Toxic Pollution

Following years of campaigning by environmental activists, Thailand has banned foreign imports of plastic waste due to concerns about toxic pollution.

Experts warn that the failure to reach an agreement on a global treaty to eliminate plastic waste will have adverse impacts on human health, reported The Guardian.

“The ban on imports will help stimulate plastic recycling in Thailand, ensuring more efficient resource usage and reducing the amount of unused plastic waste,” said Arada Fuangthong, director-general of Thailand’s Department of Foreign Trade, as Sustainable Plastics reported. “This will also help reduce pollution that could impact the environment and public health.”

Fuangthong added that Thailand’s plastic waste problem has increased “significantly,” and that the country has struggled with electronic waste being smuggled in mixed with plastic waste.

Issued by the Thai Department of Foreign Trade on January 1, the new regulation provided a grace period from December 17 to 31 to allow for the completion of pending imports.

The guidelines require the promotion of domestic plastic waste recycling by responsible agencies under the Bio, Circular, Green (BCG) economy model framework.

Thailand became a main destination for plastic waste exports from the United States, Japan, Europe and the United Kingdom after a ban was imposed by China — the largest household waste market in the world — in 2018, reported The Guardian.

Japan is among the biggest waste plastic exporters to Thailand, sending roughly 50 million kilograms of discarded plastics in 2023.

According to Thai customs officials, over 1.21 million tons of plastic scraps were received by the country from 2018 to 2021.

“The ban on all plastic scrap imports should be seen as a triumph for civil society in preventing hazardous waste from entering Thailand,” said Penchom Sae-Tang, director of NGO Ecological Alert and Recovery, as the Bangkok Post reported. “However, our work is far from over. Vigilant monitoring and robust cooperation with authorities will be critical to ensuring the law is enforced for the benefit of all.”

Plastic waste imports have been frequently burned by factories rather than being recycled, leading to negative impacts for the environment and human health, reported The Guardian.

“While this is a great step forward for Thailand, there is more work to be done. After the law comes into effect, the Thai government must work to ensure its enforcement and implementation. This means industrial, environmental and customs agencies must cooperate to prevent any illicit imports of plastic waste… the current law does not address the transit of plastic waste, meaning Thailand could be used as a transit state to send waste to our… neighbours. The Thai government must guard against this,” said Punyathorn Jeungsmarn, a plastics campaign researcher with the Environmental Justice Foundation, as The Guardian reported.

European exports of plastic waste to non-OECD nations have increased over the past several years, reported Sustainable Plastics.

Rules regulating the global export of plastic scrap exist, but compliance is hard to assess.

Thailand’s new ban comes as attempts to rescue the global plastics treaty continue. Countries failed last year to agree on a final draft following talks in Busan, South Korea.

A draft text was supported by more than 100 countries, but oil-producing nations like Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran resisted cuts to plastics production.

A date has not yet been set for further discussions on a global treaty to eliminate plastic waste.

“Plastic pollution is now recognised as not only an environmental crisis but also a critical human health crisis. The need for decisive international action to tackle plastic pollution has never been more urgent,” said professor Steve Fletcher, director of University of Portsmouth’s Revolution Plastics Institute, as The Guardian reported.

Fletcher pointed out that burning plastic as a waste management method posed severe health risks that were compounded by the plastic waste trade.

“With 16% of global municipal waste burned openly, rising to 40-65% in low-and middle-income countries, vulnerable populations bear the brunt of this crisis. The toxic fumes from burning plastic are a silent but deadly contributor to global health burdens. Urgent action is needed,” said Dr. Cressida Bowyer, deputy director of Revolution Plastics Institute, as reported by The Guardian.

The post Thailand Bans Plastic Waste Imports in Effort to Curb Toxic Pollution appeared first on EcoWatch.

Renewable Energy Made Up 62.7% of Germany’s Electricity in 2024

Renewables are now making up a majority of the net public electricity generation in Germany, according to a new report by the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (Fraunhofer ISE).

As Fraunhofer ISE reported, renewable energy sources accounted for 62.7% of the net public electricity generated in Germany in 2024. Wind energy made up the most of this share, comprising 33% of net public electricity generation at 136.4 terawatt hours (TWh). While onshore wind energy declined slightly, offshore wind power increased to 25.7 TWh compared to 2023’s 23.5 TWh.

Meanwhile, solar power in Germany reached a new record of 72.2 TWh in 2024 and exceeded the country’s photovoltaic target to install 13 gigawatts (GW) of solar for 2024, with 13.3 GW installed by November 2024 and an estimated 15.9 GW installed by the end of the year. 

Total solar power production increased by 18% compared to 2023, and solar energy made up 14% of the total net public electricity generation, according to Fraunhofer ISE. 

Solar expansion and production increased rapidly last year, despite weather conditions that were often not ideal for solar power generation, PV Magazine reported. While Germany experienced its hottest year on record, as Yahoo! reported, the country experienced heavy rainfall and thunderstorms in July, which was also the month with the most solar energy production of 2024. Heavy rain and storms continued into the fall.

The Odervorland wind farm in Brandenburg, Germany on Oct. 24, 2024. Patrick Pleul / picture alliance via Getty Images

In addition to rising renewables, reliance on hard coal and lignite for public electricity generation declined by 27.6% and 8.4%, respectively. Lignite, or brown coal, is one of the most polluting and carbon-emitting types of coal to use for power generation, according to Greenpeace. Reducing the combustion of lignite and hard coal in favor of renewables is helping to lower emissions in Germany.

“Due to the increasing share of renewable energies and the decline in coal-fired power generation, electricity generation is lower in CO2 emissions than ever before; since 2014, emissions from electricity generation have halved (from 312 to approx. 152 million tons of CO2 per year),” Fraunhofer ISE stated. “Carbon dioxide emissions from German electricity generation were 58 percent lower than at the start of data collection in 1990.”

While renewable energy expansion and generation is on the rise in Germany, the country still has more targets to meet to reach its overall clean energy goals. According to Fraunhofer ISE, onshore wind expansion, which met 2.44 GW installed for 2024, fell behind schedule of the 7 GW planned. Further, while lignite consumption declined, it still provided 71.1 TWh for net public electricity generation, nearly the same amount as solar. Natural gas consumption for electricity also increased 9.5% in 2024 compared to 2023.

To boost the continued increase in renewable energy capacity and reduce the use of fossil fuels, Germany has worked to expand battery storage. In 2024, the country increased installed battery capacity from 8.6 GW to 12.1 GW. Storage capacity increased from 12.7 gigawatt hours (GWh) to 17.7 GWh.

The German Federal Government has set a target for carbon-neutrality by 2045 as well as goals to end coal-fired power generation and meet 80% of gross electricity consumption with renewable energy sources by 2030, as United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) reported. In June 2024, the government’s climate advisors announced the country was not on track to meet its 2030 goals, Reuters reported.

The post Renewable Energy Made Up 62.7% of Germany’s Electricity in 2024 appeared first on EcoWatch.

In Latest PFAS Lawsuit, Georgia County Says Chemical Companies and Carpet Makers Used Toxins Despite Knowing Risks

In a recent lawsuit, Murray County, Georgia, alleged that corporations 3M, Daikin and DuPont have used toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) “forever chemicals” to produce products in Northwest Georgia while hiding associated dangers since the 1960s, causing a public health crisis.

The county is also suing carpet manufacturers, including Shaw and Mohawk Industries, reported The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

The lawsuit claims the companies have been aware for decades that the PFAS they produce and use are toxic, but have been concealing that knowledge and dumping contaminated waste in the county’s landfill.

“Thanks to these and other failures by the chemical makers and users, all or substantially all the residents of Northwest Georgia effectively have Scotchgard, Stainmaster, and Teflon coursing through their veins, suppressing their immune systems and triggering debilitating and fatal illnesses,” the county said in its lawsuit.

In its complaint, the Georgia county said defendants made billions from products contaminated with PFAS and should pay for necessary cleanup.

The complaint by Murray County follows another lawsuit filed by Mohawk Industries in Whitfield County against 3M, DuPont, Chemours and Daikin, alleging the chemical companies hid PFAS dangers from users.

One of the biggest carpet manufacturers in the world, Mohawk claims it was duped into using the chemicals without being aware that they could cause harm to humans and the environment, Atlanta News First reported.

Mohawk’s lawsuit claims the corporations “concealed and misrepresented material information regarding the environmental and health risks of PFAS chemicals” when it sold carpet “treatment products” to Mohawk over the course of decades.

The City of Dalton — known as “the carpet and flooring capital of the world” — has filed another lawsuit against Shaw Industries, 3M, Daikin, Chemours and others, alleging that the city’s sewage system was contaminated with PFAS by one of its largest employers. That complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court Northern District of Georgia, located in Rome.

PFAS are a group of thousands of chemicals used to make products like carpet stain- and water-resistant.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency has said PFAS have been linked to a heightened risk of decreased fertility, low birth weight and multiple forms of cancer.

Mohawk admitted that its industrial wastewater, which was contaminated with PFAS, made its way into rivers that provide local residents with drinking water.

“Mohawk has already paid over $100 million to settle certain water lawsuits in order to fund the construction of water treatment facilities to remove Defendants’ PFAS from the drinking water of the affected communities,” the lawsuit said, as reported by Atlanta News First.

The case brought by Murray County, which includes claims against Chemours, is the most recent in an increasing legal fight stemming from PFAS use in the state’s carpet manufacturing industry, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.

PFAS are referred to as “forever chemicals” because they do not break down easily in the natural environment.

Murray County’s legal team is made up of attorneys, water experts and consumer advocates that include Erin Brockovich — famous for the fight against Pacific Gas & Electric that inspired an Oscar-winning film bearing the environmental advocate’s name.

3M has said it will stop making PFAS by year’s end, and has agreed to pay as much as $12.5 billion to public water providers.

“The PFAS in and around the county’s landfill, which are migrating into the waters of the state of Georgia, must be contained, captured and destroyed,” the county stated in its lawsuit.

The post In Latest PFAS Lawsuit, Georgia County Says Chemical Companies and Carpet Makers Used Toxins Despite Knowing Risks appeared first on EcoWatch.

Biden to Ban Some Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling in a Way That Trump Can’t Easily Undo

President Joe Biden is planning to ban the development of offshore oil and gas across 625 million acres of United States coastal waters in the Atlantic, Pacific and eastern Gulf of Mexico.

The move is an effort to provide permanent protection of U.S. coastal waters and the communities that rely on them from oil and gas drilling and the risk of damaging oil spills, reported Bloomberg.

Meanwhile, Biden is leaving open the option of new oil and gas leases in western and central parts of the Gulf that provide roughly 14 percent of the country’s output, according to those familiar with the matter.

“As the climate crisis continues to threaten communities across the country and we are transitioning to a clean energy economy, now is the time to protect these coasts for our children and grandchildren,” Biden said in a statement, as The Guardian reported. “In balancing the many uses and benefits of America’s ocean, it is clear to me that the relatively minimal fossil fuel potential in the areas I am withdrawing [does] not justify the environmental, public health, and economic risks that would come from new leasing and drilling.”

The ban includes the coasts of Washington, Oregon, California and part of Alaska’s Bering Sea.

Trump said when he resumes the presidency on January 20 he would “unban” oil and gas drilling in the area “immediately,” though it is not clear if he will have the ability to easily implement this.

The ban has no expiration date and may be difficult for Trump to overturn, both politically and legally.

What has been made evident by scientists is that the production of fossil fuels must be slashed in order to avoid the most extreme impacts of climate change.

The Biden administration’s action is being taken under the federal Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of 1953, which gives the government authority over offshore resources. Eight presidents — including Trump — have previously withdrawn U.S. territory from fossil fuel drilling under the act. Trump used it to ban the extraction of oil and gas off the coasts of South Carolina, Georgia and Florida.

The law does not include an express provision allowing presidents to reverse a ban on drilling without going through Congress, however.

A rare and endangered blue whale spouts near offshore oil rigs near Long Beach, California in 2008. David McNew / Getty Images

Environmental groups approved of the bipartisan decision, which would protect marine wildlife and coastal communities from future oil spills.

Calling it an “epic ocean victory!” Joseph Gordon, conservation nonprofit Oceana’s campaign director for climate and energy, joined other environmental groups in praising the action, reported The Guardian.

“No one wants an oil spill off their coast, and our hope is that this can be a bipartisan historic moment where areas are set aside for future generations,” Gordon said during a phone interview, as The Washington Post reported.

Industry groups were not as pleased, with National Ocean Industries Association President Erik Milito expressing a desire to keep some areas open to drilling.

“Even if there’s no immediate interest in some areas, it’s crucial for the federal government to maintain the flexibility to adapt its energy policy, especially in response to unexpected global changes like the Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Milito stated in an email, as reported by The Washington Post. “Blanket bans only serve to shift energy production and economic opportunities abroad, benefiting countries like Russia at our expense.”

The move is the most recent of the Biden administration’s 11th-hour climate policy decisions before Trump returns to the White House.

“Americans on both sides of the aisle support protecting our oceans from big oil giveaways,” said Evergreen Action Executive Director Lena Moffitt, as The Guardian reported. “President Biden’s bold action today underscores that we cannot afford the continued expansion of oil and gas production if we are to meet our climate targets and avoid the worst impacts of the climate crisis.”

The post Biden to Ban Some Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling in a Way That Trump Can’t Easily Undo appeared first on EcoWatch.

Scientists Develop Biodegradable E-Textiles

In a new study, scientists from University of Southampton, University of the West of England Bristol, University of Exeter, University of Cambridge, University of Leeds and University of Bath have developed a way to make smart, electronic textiles that are also sustainable and biodegradable. 

The researchers have created ‘Smart, Wearable, and Eco-friendly Electronic Textiles’ (SWEET), technological fabrics with features like sensors or lights that are designed to biodegrade after they reach the end of their lifespan.

“Integrating electrical components into conventional textiles complicates the recycling of the material because it often contains metals, such as silver, that don’t easily biodegrade,” explained Nazmul Karim, lead author of the study and a professor at the Winchester School of Art at University of Southampton. “Our potential ecofriendly approach for selecting sustainable materials and manufacturing overcomes this, enabling the fabric to decompose when it is disposed of.”

To make a biodegradable e-textile, the researchers created a three-layer fabric with a Tencel-fabric base, an interface layer, and the sensor layer. The Tencel is a wood pulp-based fabric, and the team used graphene and a type of conductive polymer known as PEDOT:PSS for the electronic elements. 

From there, they were able to use inkjet printing to adhere these materials to the fabric, as this process used less water and energy and produced no material waste, according to the researchers.

The researchers tested the fabric by attaching it to gloves, which five humans wore in the study. The fabric was able to effectively measure the humans’ electrocardiogram (ECG) signals and skin temperature, just like many smart wearables on the market today.

Gloves with swatches of e-textile attached inside and wired for sensing testing. Marzia Dulal

“Achieving reliable, industry-standard monitoring with eco-friendly materials is a significant milestone. It demonstrates that sustainability doesn’t have to come at the cost of functionality, especially in critical applications like healthcare,” Shaila Afroj, a co-author of the study and associate professor of sustainable materials at the University of Exeter, said in a statement.

After testing how the fabric performed in tracking human physiology metrics, the team put SWEET to its bigger test — whether it was biodegradable. The fabric was buried in soil with a 6.5 to 6.8 pH in an incubator with a temperature of around 29 degrees Celsius (84 degrees Fahrenheit) and a relative humidity of around 90%.

After a four-month period, the fabric had a 48% decrease in weight and 98% decrease in strength. The graphene elements also revealed a 40 times smaller impact upon decomposition compared to standard electrodes in wearables. The researchers published their findings in the journal Energy and Environmental Materials.

According to Statista, smart wearable shipments were expected to reach 543 million units worldwide in 2024, and this number is only expected to grow, reaching an estimated 612.5 million units by 2028.

Further, a report by ResearchAndMarkets.com has estimated that the global smart textiles market will increase from $4.85 billion as of 2024 to $29.1 billion by 2033.

With this increasing demand comes the risk of increasing e-waste, or electronic waste. As Earth.org reported, humans currently generate about 50 million to 60 million tons of e-waste per year, and much of this waste does not break down into the soil. Instead, the materials can corrode or react to UV rays and leach harmful substances into the environment. According to the United Nations Institute for Training and Research, e-waste is slated to increase 32% by 2030. 

With the growing demand for smart, wearable technology, advancements such as biodegradable electronic textiles will be necessary to meet demand without contributing to more e-waste. The researchers noted that their study can help further additional research into more sustainable, and ultimately fully biodegradable or recyclable, e-textiles and other materials.

“Amid rising pollution from landfill sites, our study helps to address a lack of research in the area of biodegradation of e-textiles,” Karim said. “These materials will become increasingly more important in our lives, particularly in the area of healthcare, so it’s really important we consider how to make them more eco-friendly, both in their manufacturing and disposal.”

The post Scientists Develop Biodegradable E-Textiles appeared first on EcoWatch.

Leopards Each Have Their Own Unique Roar, Study Finds

Each leopard can be identified by their own unique roar, the first large-scale study of its kind has found.

Using a combination of camera traps and recordings, the research team was able to identify the vocalizations of individual leopards with 93.1 percent accuracy, a press release from University of Exeter said.

“Discovering that leopards have unique roars is an important but fundamentally quite basic finding that shows how little we know about leopards, and large carnivores in general,” said Jonathan Growcott, lead author of the study and a University of Exeter Ph.D. student, in the press release. “We hope it will allow leopards to become the focus of more acoustically complex science such as population density studies and open the door to more work on how large carnivores use vocalizations as a tool.”

Leopards are listed by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species as “vulnerable” to extinction, mostly due to habitat loss and conflict with humans.

Due to leopards being solitary, nocturnal and occupying large expanses of terrain, scientists have had a difficult time gathering reliable data to help with reversing population declines.

A scant amount of research has been done regarding the “sawing roar” of a leopard — a low-frequency, repeated pattern used mostly for territorial defense and to attract mates that is often able to be heard at distances of more than a kilometer away.

By using bioacoustics to study leopards — a technique more often used to monitor marine species and birds — researchers can track much bigger areas.

This could allow for more complex studies like population estimates, which are a key metric for aiding conservationists and policymakers in their understanding of landscape management and the mitigation of human-wildlife conflicts.

Conservation requires accurate information about species occupancy, populations and behaviour. However, gathering these data for elusive, solitary species, such as leopards (Panthera pardus), is often challenging. Utilizing novel technologies that augment data collection by exploiting different species’ traits could enable monitoring at larger spatiotemporal scales,” the authors wrote in the study.

The study was conducted across 450 square kilometers in Tanzania’s Nyerere National Park, where the team attached 50 camera pairs to trees alongside trails and roads. They then placed microphones beside each camera to enable them to identify individual leopards from the camera, then extract the sound of their roars from the accompanying audio.

A modeling system was used to analyze the temporal patterns of the big cats’ roars. What the researchers discovered was that not only was individual identification possible, but an overall accuracy of more than 93 percent could be achieved.

The findings, “The secret acoustic world of leopards: A paired camera trap and bioacoustics survey facilitates the individual identification of leopards via their roars,” were published in Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation.

The study showed that a wider array of species traits can be captured with the use of multiple technologies to record complementary data, rather than using a single form of technology alone.

“Importantly, our success in using a combination of different types of technology could hopefully lead others to think about how to integrate different types of technology into their research, as the rich data this provides could really push science ahead and help us understand ecosystems and landscapes in a much more holistic way,” Growcott said in the press release.

The post Leopards Each Have Their Own Unique Roar, Study Finds appeared first on EcoWatch.

Grieving Killer Whale Who Lost Her Calf in 2018 Has Again Lost a Newborn Female

In devastating news for the Pacific Northwest population of southern resident killer whales (SRKW), Tahlequah, a 25-year-old member of the group, has lost another newborn female calf.

The mother made headlines seven years ago when she swam with her deceased calf for 17 days around the Salish Sea in an act of grieving. She has two other calves, one 14 years old and another born in 2020, both males.

Southern resident killer whales are a critically endangered population of orcas, and each loss, especially a female, is considered a huge blow to the 73 who remain. According to the Center for Whale Research, it is believed that there are just 23 breeding females left, reported The Guardian.

“The death of any calf in the SRKW population is a tremendous loss, but the death of J61 is particularly devastating, not just because she was a female, who could have one day potentially led her own matriline but also given the history of her mother J35 who has now lost two out of four documented calves – both of which were female,” the center wrote in a statement on Facebook.

The primary food source of southern resident killer whales is Chinook salmon, which have been in steep decline for years, BBC Wildlife reported. According to researchers at University of Washington, this impacts the nutrition and reproduction of the whales, which are listed as endangered in the United States and Canada.

Conservation groups have asked the environment minister of Canada to issue an emergency order to protect the imperilled species, reported The Guardian. The powers have been used just twice before: once to protect the western chorus frog of Québec, and the other to save Alberta’s greater sage-grouse.

Southern resident killer whales have been known to travel as much as 75 miles a day. In 2018, Tahlequah’s heart wrenching display of grief for her baby happened off the coast of Victoria, British Columbia. This time, she is mourning the loss of her newborn in Puget Sound, off the shores of Washington State.

SRKW face other threats, including disturbance and noise from vessels — which make it more difficult for them to hunt — as well as fishing gear, plastics and other pollution in the food chain.

“It’s so much harder to see now that she has lost another one,” said Brad Hanson, a research scientist with Seattle’s Northwest Fisheries Science Center, part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, as The New York Times reported.

Hanson said he wasn’t sure why Tahlequah’s calf, born around Christmas, had died.

The deep mourning of Tahlequah of her first female calf in 2018 became a symbol of the southern resident killer whales’ plight. Though orcas sometimes display their grief as Tahlequah did, scientists considered the roughly 1,000-mile journey carrying her calf unprecedented.

Tahlequah is still caring for the second son she gave birth to in 2020.

Scientists said on Thursday that, as she clings to the body of her dead calf, Tahlequah cannot forage for food, but that her loyal pod, especially her sister, had been seen at her side throughout the ordeal.

SRKW are one of several orca communities that live in the Pacific Northwest. While they mostly occupy waters near Washington State and British Columbia, some venture south to California and north to Alaska.

Females typically live as long as 50 or 60 years and weigh as much as 16,000 pounds, while males live approximately 30 years and can weigh 22,000 pounds.

Researchers were at first optimistic about Tahlequah’s newborn, known as J61, but quickly suspected the calf was having health problems, reported The Guardian.

“Early life is always dangerous for new calves, with a very high mortality rate in the first year. J35 is an experienced mother, and we hope that she is able to keep J61 alive through these difficult early days,” the Center for Whale Research wrote on December 23.

The orca’s death left the team “deeply saddened.”

About 50 percent of orca calves die in their first year, and many orca pregnancies fail, The New York Times reported.

Another calf born to the same pod was spotted on Wednesday. Neither the mother nor the gender of the newborn have been confirmed. The calf, who appears to be healthy, brings hope to the population.

It came as no surprise to scientists that Tahlequah mourned the loss of her babies in such a profound way.

“Over the last few years, we realize that we have the same neurotransmitters that they have,” said Joe Gaydos, science director of University of California, Davis’ SeaDoc Society, as reported by The New York Times. “We have the same hormones that they have. Why shouldn’t we also have the emotions that they have? We don’t have the market cornered on emotions. So I think it’s fair to say that she is grieving or mourning.”

The post Grieving Killer Whale Who Lost Her Calf in 2018 Has Again Lost a Newborn Female appeared first on EcoWatch.